Clarity regarding financial obligations of franchisees

Franchisees generally have various long-term financial obligations towards the franchisor. This includes, for example, fee obligations, obligations with regard to contributions for advertising and promotion, rents in connection with possible subletting, as well as various other obligations such as (additional) financial obligations in the field of training, administration, additional marketing efforts, etc.

One of the most important principles of the European Code of Honor on Franchising is that it must be possible to deduce unambiguously from the franchise agreement how all financial obligations between franchisor and franchisee work together. This means that, for example, turnover-related sublease obligations must be integrated into the franchise agreement or must form part of the franchise agreement as an integral appendix. This may also relate to abruptly changing supplier credit, if the franchisor also has a wholesale function. Franchisees can suddenly find themselves in business difficulties as a result of such a change of course. By no means always does such an essential obligation – which does not take into account whether this last example has been agreed in advance – form part of the franchise agreement, or a very clear reference is missing, for example to general terms and conditions in which this is clearly and must be made transparent by the franchisor. After all, he is under the obligation, in accordance with the European Code of Honor on Franchising, to make essential financial obligations known in advance and, moreover, to record these in the franchise agreement.

Franchisees are therefore advised to assess all relevant documents (franchise agreement, sublease agreement, general terms and conditions, etc.) in advance when concluding the franchise agreement in order to prevent misunderstandings along the way. A good franchisor will of course proceed on its own initiative to explicitly indicate to the franchisees all essential financial obligations in advance. After all, he takes the European Code of Honor on Franchising as his starting point. If the franchisor is a member of the Dutch Franchise Association (NFV), he is also bound to do so at all times in accordance with the articles of association of the NFV.

Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice

Other messages

Compensation for reputational damage to the franchisor

A developer of a digital platform for a franchisor had provided a platform that any third party could access.

Sale of a franchise company due to a non-competition clause: False construction or not?

Franchisees who are unwilling or unable to continue with the franchise company experience whether or not the non-competition clause is valid or not.

Prohibited Franchise Agreements: Conduct of Franchisees Among Others

Forms of franchising that do not involve a vertical relationship between the franchisor on the one hand and the franchisees on the other may be prohibited.

A new franchisor against will and thanks

Mergers between franchise organizations are no longer an exception. Multivlaai/Limburgia, DA/DIO, Emté/Jumbo are recent examples of this.

Supreme Court: Code of Honor regarding franchising has no legal effect – dated September 25, 2018 – mr. AW Dolphin

Supreme Court: Code of honor on franchising has no legal force

By Alex Dolphijn|25-09-2018|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |
Go to Top