Bankrupt because the franchisor refused to sell the franchise company – dated January 28, 2020 – mr. AW Dolphin

By Published On: 28-01-2020Categories: Statements & current affairs

The District Court of The Hague 19 November 2019, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2019:12288 (KFC)
handled a request from a franchisor for a franchisee
to declare bankruptcy. However, the franchisee indicates that the
franchise company could have been or would have been sold, but the
franchisor has opposed this.

The franchise agreement stipulates that in the event of an intended sale of
any interest in the franchise business, the franchisee to the
franchisor would submit the draft purchase agreement. Furthermore, it is the
franchisee prohibited from selling the franchise without the
the franchisor’s prior written approval.

The franchisee has put forward a prospective buyer on two occasions
to have found, but that the franchisor will not allow the sale of the
franchise company by refusing its permission. The
In this context, the franchisor has undisputedly argued that it has never
draft purchase agreement, for what reason it
prospective buyers has not been approved.

The franchisor has indicated its preference for a
other, third party prospective purchaser. The franchisee has indicated the by
to accept this third party offered prize. In this way the
claim can still be paid and become a bankruptcy
turned away. However, during the subsequent oral hearing
revealed that this third party has withdrawn.

Under these circumstances, according to the court, it cannot be
concluded that filing for bankruptcy by standards of
reasonableness and fairness is unacceptable. The importance of the
franchisor that its claim is paid. That is her interest
given a bankruptcy, now a bankruptcy will lead to it too
monetize the assets of the franchisee’s business with
for the purpose of paying the creditors (to the extent and as much as possible). A
further delay of payment is not justified by the interests of
defendant, now that there is no prospect of a private sale of the
assets of the franchise company out of bankruptcy within a short
term.

It is not inconceivable that a franchisor with refusing a
prospective buyer achieves that the franchisee can no longer meet his debts
to fulfil. If a franchisee believes that this right of approval from the
franchisor is abused, for example in a bankruptcy
get a new franchisee (who has had to pay less as a purchase price
payment), then it is difficult to prove.

mr. AW Dolphijn – franchise lawyer

Ludwig & Van Dam Franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice. Want
you respond?

Go to dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl

Other messages

Obligation to sell back at the end of the franchise agreement

Franchise agreements sometimes provide that the franchisee is required to sell back purchased assets at the end of the franchise agreement.

Position of franchisees in franchisor restructuring

Franchisees must be adequately and generously informed in advance by the franchisor about the content and consequences of (further) agreements...

Interview Franchise+ – mrs. J. Sterk and AW Dolphijn – “Reversal of burden of proof in forecasts approved by court” – February 2018

The new Acquisition Fraud Act indeed appears to be relevant for the franchise industry, according to this article from Franchise+. Alex Dolphijn of Ludwig & Van Dam assists a franchisee in a

By Ludwig en van Dam|01-02-2018|Categories: Dispute settlement, Forecasting issues, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , , |

Article Franchise & Law No. 7 – Franchise agreement as general terms and conditions

Uniformity of the franchise formula and (therefore also) uniformity of the agreements with the franchisees will often be of great importance to the franchisor.

By Alex Dolphijn|01-02-2018|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |

The franchisee’s customer base

If the partnership between a franchisee and a franchisor ends, the question of who will continue to serve the customers may arise.

Go to Top