Article Franchise+: “With our franchise formula you will earn mountains of gold.” dated 10 July 2019 – mr. AW Dolphin

By mr. A.W. DolphijnPublished On: 12-07-2019Categories: Columns

According to jurisprudence, recommendations of a franchise formula in purely general terms are not easily impermissible. Even if the information provided by the franchisor about the results to be achieved is unrealistic, it is conceivable that prospective franchisees cannot simply rely on the factual accuracy if the information does not go beyond promoting the franchise formula in general terms. After all, the average public acting commercially should be aware of, and therefore not be influenced by, the fact that advertising often has a certain exaggeration.

For example, the Amsterdam District Court ruled that a franchisor merely praised the franchise formula in general terms by stating that a certain average turnover is achieved by the franchisees. The fact that this average turnover is not achieved by a particular franchisee does not mean that the franchisor should not have made the announcement. Also, in another case, it was held that there were only general promotions with the statement that the franchise formula was “the best price level!” and is able “to achieve this best price level because you benefit from international purchasing advantage because you buy from the source.”

Promotions are not always permissible. After all, advertising can go further than an endorsement and may contain information, such as omissions, that is misleading are. It will not always be obvious when there are generalized praise and the provision or withholding of inadmissible information. information on the acquisition of franchisees by franchisors. The legislator has provided more clarity about the impermissible with the introduction of the Acquisition Fraud Act. Under acquisition fraud be deceptive commercial practices involving the use of certain sales techniques aimed at gaining trust and arousing expectations in order to induce the other to enter into an agreement, whereby the consideration is not or hardly properly provided. The law Acquisition fraud explicitly refers to misleading statements such as ten regarding “statistical data”. It is also worth considering in this context historical data or forecasts. Of commendation in general terms will then not soon. With franchising in particular, the franchise formula will be promoted by the franchisor with historical data or forecasts. The the question then is whether that commendation takes place in “general terms”. The distinction between permissible promotions and misleading information remains a gray area, despite the relevant legislation. Each individual case will always have to be judged on its own.

Click here for the entire article.

mr. AW Dolphijn – franchise lawyer

Ludwig & Van Dam Franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice.

Do you want to respond? Go to dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl

Other messages

Franchisees Op=Op lose lawsuit (ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2015:4271)

In many franchise formulas, especially in retail, the franchisor also acts as a wholesaler

By Ludwig en van Dam|15-09-2015|Categories: Franchise Knowledge Center / National Franchise and Formula Letter Publications|

Keep your cool with franchise agreement

By Alex Dolphijn|11-09-2015|Categories: Columns|

Purchase obligation and competitive prices

On 9 September 2015, the District Court of the Northern Netherlands rendered a judgment on the question of whether a franchisor used market-based prices in the case of an exclusive purchase obligation.