Article Franchise+ – “Immediate information obligations of franchisors upon operation of the Franchise Act” – mr. AW Dolphijn – dated June 25, 2020
As soon as the passed bill enters into force, it has immediate effect
effect on franchise agreements that already exist. The plan is that Law
franchise will enter into force on 1 January 2021, so the question is whether the
information flows are legally optimally arranged.
An example of the information obligation in current franchise agreements
is the franchisor’s obligation to be accountable
about the use of the financial contributions paid by franchisees
to have. Through this obligation, the franchisee can up to
check to some extent whether the requested contributions are not unreasonably high.
Franchisees would then be able to reclaim the “overpayment”.
Another example is the franchisor’s obligation to provide certain
provide information of which the franchisor knows or reasonably knows
may suspect that it is important with a view to carrying out the
franchise agreement by the franchisee. So this is what it’s about
situations of pre-existing franchise agreements. Intended is the
provide the franchisee with the necessary transparency in a timely manner regarding certain
(proposed) acts of and developments at the franchisor. Than
can the franchisee prepare for this in good time, for example by doing so
necessary to request further information or consultation and in good time if necessary
make necessary adjustments to its own business operations or
make any financial reservations.
The information to be provided by the franchisor shall be such
manner, that that information is and remains accessible
for the other franchisee, as long as it serves the purpose. The to provide
information also serves the average franchisee within the
relevant chain clearly, comprehensibly and unambiguously formulated and
be designed.
By no means all franchise organizations have a clear picture of which information
which moment to share. Sometimes it is so important
trade secrets that it is undesirable to place the franchisees in a (too)
information at an early stage. It seems that many franchisor rush
will have to deal with the organization of legal information flows.
Diligence is called for now that January 1, 2021 is fast approaching.
mr. AW Dolphijn – franchise lawyer
Ludwig & Van Dam Franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice. Want
you respond? Go to dolphijn@ludwigvandam.nl
Other messages
Infringement of exclusive service area by franchisor in connection with formula change dated February 27, 2017
On 30 January 2017, the provisional relief judge of the District Court of Noord-Holland, ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2017:688 (Intertoys/franchisee), was asked how to deal with the
Forecasts at startup franchise formula
The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled on 14 February 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:455 (Tot Straks/franchisee) on the question whether the franchisor had provided an unsatisfactory prognosis and whether the
Mandatory transfer of franchise business to franchisor?
On January 23, 2017, the District Court of Amsterdam, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:412 (CoffeeCompany/Dam Spirit BV) rendered a judgment on the question whether a franchisee upon termination of the cooperation
Transfer customer data to franchisor
In its judgment of 10 January 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:68 (OnlineAccountants.nl), the Amsterdam Court ruled, among other things, on the question of how customer data should be transferred.
Franchise Closing Sale – Who Gets the Sale Proceeds?
The judgment of the District Court of the Northern Netherlands dated 12 October 2016, ECLI:NL:RBNNE:2016:5061 (Administrator/Expert Group and Rabobank), focused on the question whether the franchisor, together with the bank,
Column Franchise+ – mr. Th.R. Ludwig: “Judge: franchisor’s duty of care comparable to that of a bank”
Various judgments in 2016 made it clear how high the standard of care for a franchisor towards its franchisees is.