Agreement between parties

A franchise agreement is created by an offer from one party (the franchisor) and the acceptance of that offer by the other party (the franchisee). In short, an agreement must be reached between both parties, after which the franchise agreement is formally concluded. In principle, the way in which an offer and acceptance are made is form-free. Unfortunately, it regularly happens that one party believed that there was an (oral) agreement, while the other party was still dubbing. “But we still had a deal” is a frequently heard statement. Unfortunately, there is no deal, just miscommunication between parties.

As indicated above, the way in which a franchise agreement is concluded is in principle free of form. In case law, however, it has often been ruled that the lack of a written record of the agreements between the parties is an indication that the necessary agreement between the parties has not been reached. This applies in particular in the case of important or large transactions, such as the conclusion of a franchise agreement or the purchase of a supermarket, or unusual transactions, such as the donation of large amounts of money. For example, in 1925 the Dutch court ruled that “every possibility of misunderstanding between the negotiators” must be excluded if a guarantee with a very large financial interest is provided that has not been laid down in writing.

To avoid misunderstandings between the parties during negotiations on major transactions, such as the conclusion of a franchise agreement,  it may therefore be useful to make clear, and preferably written, agreements with each other in advance if there is agreement between the parties. This, of course, to prevent the parties from reaching an agreement unintentionally. For example, it could be agreed that there is only acceptance of the franchisor’s offer if there is agreement on all individual points on the part of the franchisee. It can also be agreed that an oral agreement from the franchisee is not sufficient, but that the franchise agreement will not come into effect until all parties have signed a written franchise agreement to that effect. In this way the parties force themselves to put their thoughts on paper, the parties can better estimate the scope of their rights and obligations and the chance of miscommunication can be reduced.

If you are confronted with a party who believes they have reached an agreement with you, while you were not aware of any wrongdoing, then it is of course useful to inform the other party clearly and as soon as possible. If you cannot come to an agreement with the other party, it is of course wise to seek legal help.

Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice

Other messages

The (in)validity of a post-contractual non-competition clause in a franchise agreement: analogy with employment law?

On 5 September 2017, the District Court of Gelderland, ECLI:NL:RBGEL:2017:4565, rendered a judgment on, among other things, the question of whether Bruna, as a franchisor, could invoke the prohibition for a

Column Franchise+ – mr. J Sterk: “Court orders fast food chain to extend franchise agreement

The case is set to begin this year. For years, the franchisee has been refusing to sign the new franchise agreement that was offered with renewal, as it would lead to a deterioration of his legal position

By Jeroen Sterk|01-09-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |

Not a valid non-compete clause for franchisee

On 18 November 2016, the interim relief judge of the Central Netherlands District Court, ECLI:NL:RBMNE:2016:7754, rendered a judgment in the issue concerning whether the franchisee was held

Franchise & Law No. 5 – Acquisition Fraud and Franchising Act

The Acquisition Fraud Act came into effect on 1 July 2016. This includes amendments to Section 6:194 of the Dutch Civil Code.

By Ludwig en van Dam|10-08-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Forecasting issues, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , , |

Does a franchisee have to accept a new model franchise agreement?

On 31 March 2017, the District Court of Rotterdam, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2017:2457, ruled in interlocutory proceedings on the question whether franchisor Bram Ladage had complied with the franchise agreement with its franchisee.

Mandatory (market-based) purchase prices for franchisees

To what extent can a franchisor change agreements about the (market) purchase prices of the goods that the franchisees are obliged to purchase?

Go to Top