A proven success formula?

In these times of malaise and tentative recovery, it is of course also grating and hinged in the franchise world. In addition to the loss of chains and reorganisations, the current juncture also offers opportunities for new possibilities. New initiatives are emerging here and there, most of which should be welcomed. This offers opportunities for starting franchisees. However, you should count to ten before embracing a new adventure.

After all, the new initiatives must have already proven themselves in practice, which is an essential feature of any franchise formula. The franchisor must have successfully applied the concept offered for a reasonable period of time before starting a franchise organization. The European Code of Honor on franchising therefore sets this requirement.
If there is a so-called pilot location, then the prospective franchisee would be wise to ask for all relevant information that is important. This includes, for example, the provision of available figures. It should also be investigated whether the alleged success of the pilot location can be duplicated in the location of the intended franchisee.

A thorough site investigation is necessary for this. Each franchisor must at least commit to the results of the location survey and the financial prognosis derived therefrom for a series of years for the benefit of the franchisee. In addition, matters such as a detailed franchise agreement, including a clear overview of all financial obligations and a completed manual, must be present. An alert candidate franchisee will also ask for insight into the financial status of the candidate franchisor. Usually this is not provided. Nevertheless, the prospective franchisee would be wise, within the limited space that is usually offered to him in this respect, to convince himself that the prospective franchisor is financially sound enough to enable the obligations towards the franchisee to be met on a lasting basis. The possible growth strategy must also be known to the prospective franchisee. Here, too, it must be considered whether the franchisor can actually meet these requirements.

Conversations with any existing (new) franchisees can of course also provide a lot of useful information.
Also in these times applies: Look before you leap.

Ludwig & Van Dam franchise attorneys, franchise legal advice

Other messages

Column Franchise+ – mr. Th.R. Ludwig: “Delivery stop by franchisor again not allowed”

Once again, the president in preliminary relief proceedings ruled on the question whether a franchisor's supply stop against the franchisee was permitted, with the franchisee paying a substantial

The manager (employee) who becomes a franchisee – fictitious employment?

On 14 December 2016, the subdistrict court judge of the District Court of Noord-Holland, ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2016:11031 (Employee/Espresso Lounge), considered the situation in which an employee

The Supreme Court sets strict requirements for franchise forecasts

A ruling by the Supreme Court on Friday casts a new light on the provision of profit and turnover forecasts to aspiring franchisees.

By Ludwig en van Dam|28-02-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Forecasting issues, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , , |

Infringement of exclusive service area by franchisor in connection with formula change dated February 27, 2017

On 30 January 2017, the provisional relief judge of the District Court of Noord-Holland, ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2017:688 (Intertoys/franchisee), was asked how to deal with the

By Alex Dolphijn|27-02-2017|Categories: Dispute settlement, Franchise Agreements, Statements & current affairs|Tags: , |

Forecasts at startup franchise formula

The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled on 14 February 2017, ECLI:NL:GHAMS:2017:455 (Tot Straks/franchisee) on the question whether the franchisor had provided an unsatisfactory prognosis and whether the

Mandatory transfer of franchise business to franchisor?

On January 23, 2017, the District Court of Amsterdam, ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2017:412 (CoffeeCompany/Dam Spirit BV) rendered a judgment on the question whether a franchisee upon termination of the cooperation

Go to Top